Life And Liberty News


This week, Bernie Sanders was grilled on 60 Minutes over how he’ll pay for all his socialist plans. Both Democrats and Republicans complained he could never find the money for his trillion-dollar agenda. Sanders quickly released a plan on his campaign website. In a word, it’s terrible.

Democrats are panicking over the fact that Sanders is winning their primary race. For good reason. Sanders is an open socialist. He seems to despise our capitalist economic system. You know, the system that has brought America untold wealth and prosperity?

Sanders hates billionaires, but apparently has no problem with millionaires (because he’s one of them). To win over his rabid followers, he’s promising all kinds of “free” government handouts. He wants to make college free and forgive student loan debt. Another major promise from Sanders is his “Medicare for All,” a government-run program that would put private health providers out of business.

These all sound great—if you’re a dummy who doesn’t want to pay for things. But if you’ve ever worked a day in your life, you know this all sounds too good to be true. Even Anderson Cooper demanded Sanders explain how he’d pay for all these goodies. Finally, the socialist released a plan on how he’d pay for all his government-run ideas.

Let’s just say, he’ll tank the country faster than we thought.

Bernie Sanders unexpectedly released a fact-sheet Monday night explaining that he’d pay for his sweeping new government programs through new taxes and massive lawsuits against the fossil fuel industry, as well as by slashing spending on the military, among other methods…

The plan also did not discuss how the government would be able to reliably obtain the money, given that many investments could simply be liquidated or transferred elsewhere before his administration took office…

Sanders claimed to be able to raise “$3.085 trillion by making the fossil fuel industry pay for their pollution, through litigation, fees, and taxes, and eliminating federal fossil fuel subsidies.” [Source: Fox News]

If you ever wanted to know how a crazy, out-of-touch communist would run the economy, take a look at Sanders’ plan.
Now, I’m no economist, but if the government created countless new taxes on the stock market, corporations, and the rich—I’m thinking it would create catastrophe. Sanders’ plan would put heavy burdens on just about every transaction in the stock market. The wealthiest Americans (who create businesses and jobs) would be hammered with unrealistic and abusive taxes.

Sanders wants to attack the fossil fuel industry with endless lawsuits to drain them of money. Apparently, the companies that provide us with affordable fuel and energy are now villains out of a comic book.

On top of that, he’d rip over $1 trillion from our military, “scaling back” our operations. Oh, that’s a good idea! We face dangers from Iran, Afghanistan, North Korea, Russia, China and parts beyond. But we should be rolling back our military so our country’s weak and defenseless. I know Sanders is a braindead hippy, but I didn’t know he was this stupid.

Then there’s the fact that Sanders wants to provide free health care to illegal immigrants. His plans did not address how much that would cost. So, you can expect whatever final expenses to double or even triple.

After Sanders rolled out this insane plan, he once again praised the murderous dictatorship of Fidel Castro, over how he helped Cubans learn to read. Really, Bernie? You’re still praising Castro because literacy rates rose? Nearly every developed country has schools that teach children how to read (including the United States). You can’t ignore the atrocities Castro committed, because of one small goal.

It’s hard to believe anyone would endorse Sanders after his terrible plan is unveiled. Any America who still thinks Sanders has America’s best intentions at heart is blind. He is a communist that wants to bankrupt our country and turn us into broke, enslaved Cuba.

Thank God, Donald Trump is going to kick his ass.

From all appearances, Bernie Sanders has won the Nevada caucuses. This clinches his status as the Democratic primary frontrunner. The Democrat establishment is panicking as they watch their worst fears come true. Now, they and the mainstream media are turning on Sanders to ensure he does not win the nomination… and lose to Trump.

Talk about fair-weathered friends, huh? Bernie Sanders has been a faithful ally to the Democratic Party for years. Sure, he’s normally an independent who slanders capitalism and endorses socialism, but when he needs the support of large voter base, he pretends to be a Democrat. Why shouldn’t the party bend over backwards to endorse his bid for the White House?

We’ve watched as the establishment worked to undermine Sanders’ campaign. It’s been going on all year. But now that he’s won an additional state in the primary race, they are really worried. People like Barack Obama know that if Sanders squeaks into the nomination, the party will lose not only the race for the White House, but quite possibly the House.

“It’s bad,” said one freshman Democrat from a swing district. “We are having conversations about how to deal with this.”

“If [Sanders] is the nominee, we lose,” said one Democrat. [Source: Fox News]

Which is why the Democrats and their lackies in the media have come out in full force against the socialist.
“Sen. Sanders believes in an inflexible, ideological revolution that leaves out most Democrats, not to mention most Americans,” [Pete Buttigieg] argued…

Buttigieg also claimed Sanders and his supporters are taking aim at moderate Democrats running in congressional races, saying the senator, “is ignoring, dismissing, or even attacking the very Democrats we absolutely must send to Capitol Hill. [Source: Fox News]

Joe Biden, whose campaign is limping along, criticized Bernie Sanders for how he tried to run against Obama in 2012. The liberal media is digging up old stories about Sanders’ connection to the Soviet Union, his love of communism, and fondness for infamous dictator Fidel Castro.

Not that they had to work hard to find these quotes. Sanders keeps giving them to them!

Sen. Bernie Sanders, the frontrunner for the Democrats’ presidential nomination, doubled down on his support for some of Cuban dictator Fidel Castro’s policies, saying in an interview that aired Sunday, “it’s unfair to simply say everything is bad.”

“When Fidel Castro came into office, you know what he did? He had a massive literacy program. Is that a bad thing? Even though Fidel Castro did it?” Sanders told Anderson Cooper. [Source: Fox News]

Wow. And Sanders wants to become president of America? How can any legitimate candidate in the United States say a positive thing about Fidel Castro? This is the same Cuban dictator who acquired nukes from Russia and had them pointed at major U.S. cities. The only reason he didn’t use them was because of a blockade ordered by a tougher, more competent leader by the name of John F. Kennedy.

Castro is also the dictator who sent gay men to force labor camps, to kill them off. He also oppressed and murdered his people—for decades. Who cares if someone can read, when they’re being lined up for the firing range?

The Democrats don’t seem to have to work really hard to cast Sanders in a poor light. He does that himself! His plans for America are terrible. His “Medicare for All” and free college tuition would bankrupt our country. The sky-high taxes he’d implement would wipe out any economic prosperity we are currently enjoying.

But it seems Democratic voters want him, not one of the other candidates. Perhaps it’s because, out of all these clowns, he appears the most competent (scary, I know). Or perhaps smart Democrats have already left the party for the Trump train and are sitting out of the primaries.

Or perhaps, more accurately, the Democratic Party is long dead and Sanders (along with the rest of the socialists) is a vulture picking at the corpse.

Once upon a time, Joe Biden was considered the Democrat frontrunner. The former vice president was supposed to be a shoo-in for the nomination. Some even thought he was the only one to challenge Donald Trump. But now he’s flagging in the polls and might lose the primaries. Watching his chances crumble, the man appears to be breaking down.

Joe Biden doesn’t have the best history communicating. During the Obama administration, he gave the president unending grief with his bizarre, confused gaffes. The media tried to write them off as “senior moments,” or just simple mistakes. But they kept adding up.

They only got worse when he started his campaign for president. We all remember the “smart kids” comment when he compared smart children to “black children.” Ouch. Over the course of his 2020 campaign, he hasn’t done himself any favors with his unusual and hard-to-defend comments.

That might not be the reason he’s falling behind Sanders, Buttigieg, or even Bloomberg. It could be all the negative press that came out of the impeachment scandal. The media tried to brand Trump as some kind of criminal that needed to be remove from office. But it was Joe Biden and his son Hunter, that many Americans questioned.
To date, Biden refuses to give a good answer over their arrangement in Ukraine.

Now, with his campaign near collapse, Biden seems to be coming apart at the seams. In a recent event, he claims his late son was… Attorney General of the United States?

Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden could not remember what his late son Beau Biden did for work during a CNN town hall event on Thursday night, falsely claiming that his son was “Attorney General of the United States.”

Biden’s son was not the Attorney General of the United States; he was the Attorney General of Delaware. [Source: Daily Wire]

Was that a slip of the tongue? Was Joe lying? Or is it he just can’t remember correctly? You know, there is a big difference between a state attorney general and the man who runs the entire Department of Justice.

If that bothered you, this should get you downright nervous. During another moment, Joe Biden effectively said as president, he’d ban all firearms.

Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden made extreme remarks during a CNN town hall event on Thursday night where he called for banning semi-automatic firearms and “clips that have multiple bullets in them,” which would effectively ban nearly all firearms…

“And to get those clips that have multiple bullets in them not for sale, not be able to sell silencers, all those things.” [Source: Daily Wire]

Uh… I’m no gun expert, but I at least know that all clips hold multiple bullets. You won’t find a gun (even a six-shooter) that doesn’t hold “multiple” bullets.

It’s a sad reality that every Democrat running for president wants extreme gun control measures. We thought Bloomberg was the worst. But if Biden means what he says, we could be looking at a man trying to openly destroy the Second Amendment.

Was Joe just confused? Was he stumbling over his words again? Did he mean clips with large capacities? Or was he really suggesting we should ban firearms? This isn’t the first time he’s said this. He’s even said he was unwilling to compromise over this issue with Republicans.

So maybe he is the most extreme anti-Second Amendment candidate. Or, he’s just getting too tired and confused for this race. I’m not sure which is worse.

If we take Biden at his word, we’d have to forgive the many times he makes false claims—about his family, the economy, and everything else. And we’d have to accept the fact that he wants to get rid of “assault weapons” and every type of ammo clip.

That’s pretty bad. I think now I know why he’s really slipping in the polls.

Rumors have swirled over a member of the White House staff who claims to oppose Trump from the inside. This anonymous figure has written a New York Times op-ed and even a book. But this mysterious person might just want to start looking for another job, after Trump made this claim.

From the start of his presidency, Donald Trump has faced near-endless opposition. And not just from corrupt Democrats. Agents working within his own government have tried to undermine him, even take him down.

We know all about the “deep state,” intelligence agents who conspired to rig the election and frame Trump over the Russian hoax. These men, loyal to the Democrats, tried to abuse their power to prevent the president from getting elected and taking office.

Today, many of these men walk free, despite jeopardizing our democracy.

Then there were the leakers. Early in Trump administration, all kinds of bizarre “leaks” came out about his antics inside the White House. The fake news had a field day spinning what could only be lies. The leaks went away after Trump fired a few key figures.

Then there’s “Anonymous.” A person claiming to be a government official within the Trump administration made the wild boast that they are resisting him from the inside. They wrote an article for the far-left New York Times and even published a book. The idea that a key official is trying to undermine the president gave rabid liberals goosebumps, whether it was true or not.

But Trump has bad news for all of them.

“It’s not so much a search… I know who it is,” Trump told reporters prior to boarding Air Force One on Tuesday, as they repeatedly asked him to reveal the name.

“Can’t tell you that,” he replied. “But I know who it is. We won’t get into it, people know it’s a fraud.”

“I know all about ‘Anonymous,’” Trump told reporters. [Source: Breitbart]

Many have speculated over the identity of Anonymous. Some thought, for a time, it was Mike Pence himself. Incredibly unlikely, given Pence’s continued commitment to the Trump agenda. Others have floated names within the National Security Council or other departments.

You might remember that numerous people were fired recently, after Trump’s impeachment trial ended. It’s very likely that someone like Alexander Vindman—who threw the president under the bus—was the man inventing stories for the Times and his book. Hell, it could have been John Bolton, a man who appears to have a chip on his shoulder after being fired.

But could it be someone who still works in the administration? You might be wondering why Trump doesn’t expose or fire this person. Perhaps he’s living by the old adage, “Keep your friends close and your enemies closer”?

Or perhaps this person isn’t in the White House, at all. By hiding their identity, they can say whatever they want about Trump—and nobody can disprove them. Why should we believe this person actually works in the administration, when we know what they’ve said about Trump is a lie?

They claimed Trump stumbles, slurs his words, is confused, and has trouble “synthesizing information” (whatever that means). Does that sound like the president to you—or something a Trump-hating Democrat would say?

We’ve seen plenty of liberals (including Pelosi and Clinton) fit those descriptions, but never Trump.

It could be this “Anonymous” is yet another media hack, trying to sell books and discredit the president. That could be why Trump hasn’t fired them. But why can’t he expose them? Why not just blow the whistle on this liar and have it over with?

That might be happening very soon. But President Trump has a way of toying with the left that always works out to his favor. No matter what he does, it will be perfect… and hilarious to watch.

Thanks to record unemployment and a surging economy, Donald Trump is in a good position to win re-election. The only thing standing in his way is whomever the Democrats nomination to run against him. But things aren’t looking very good for the Democrats. And, according to Chris Matthews, if this person gets the nod, Trump wins bigly.

The 2020 Democratic primaries have been a bust. You can imagine how much the left wanted, needed to find one winner out of the lot of them. It hasn’t happened. It’s been a long time since 2008, when out of nowhere a star emerged named Barack Obama.

(He was a terrible president, but he was at least good at winning elections.)

Democrats don’t know what to do. They definitely don’t seem determined to win over American voters. We’ve watched several of their “frontrunners” burn out pretty quickly. At one point, Elizabeth Warren was the “woman to beat.” But she fizzled. Then Joe Biden, former vice president and Obama ally, collapsed.

Now, Michael Bloomberg is spending hundreds of millions on ads for his campaign. But he’s yet to qualify for any of the early primaries. The only candidate that appears to have a shot is Bernie Sanders, a 30-year veteran of D.C. who embraces far-left socialism. That’s not good for the country or the Democrats.

In fact, if the party nominates Bernie, they’ll lose the election by a wide margin. Just ask Trump-hating news host Chris Matthews.

Leftist MSNBC host Chris Matthews said on Tuesday that if socialist Bernie Sanders wins the Democratic nomination for president that Democrats will lose 49 states to President Donald Trump.

While talking about how the other candidates are not attacking Sanders’ ideology, Matthews said, “They’re just pandering to the Bernie people and you know what pandering gets you? Nothing. It certainly doesn’t get you respect.”

“They’ve got to get out there and say I disagree with socialism; I believe in the markets; I think he’s wrong,” Matthew said. “I think you’ll never get it done and this country will never go that direction, by the way we’ll lose forty nine states.” [Source: Daily Wire]

Matthews seems to be seeing the writing on the wall. He’s hardly a Trump fan. But at least he’s willing to accept that if the Democrats nominate an extremist like Bernie Sanders, they’d lose 49 states to Donald Trump.

Why? Let’s look at Sanders’ platform. He wants to implement universal health care, a plan that would put thousands in the medical profession out of work and cost taxpayers trillions. Sanders has expressed support for the Green New Deal, which would (among other things) destroy America’s energy dominance by banning fracking, oil production, and even automobiles.

Sanders has long promised free college tuition, another massive tax burden on working Americans. He’s for open borders, so goodbye blue collar jobs. On top of that, he’d pass so much regulation, few companies could even turn a profit.

Compare that to Donald Trump who, over the last three years, has turned around our economy. His conservative, free market policies have brought jobs back, lowered taxes, restored the economy, and given the U.S. energy independence.

It’s a no brainer. Sanders would mean the death of the American economy (and many other things). He would wipe out our prosperity almost overnight.

The funny thing? The Democrats can’t find anyone that can offer anything better. Even “moderate” Bloomberg can’t promise a better economy than Trump’s. Plus, Bloomberg wants to push gun control, government-run health care, and open borders.

You’d think, by now, that the Democrats could have found at least one candidate that was American first in their views. But no, they are all socialists who would pander to China and globalists.

America is done with those clowns. And on November 3, we’re going to let everyone know.

Some Democrats consider Michael Bloomberg the only “moderate” candidate that can beat Donald Trump. Even the DNC is bending the rules so that he can appear on the debate stage. But the billionaire’s presidential wishes might already be crashing, now that several more damning videos have hit the Internet.

Whoever convinced Michael Bloomberg to run for president must be kicking themselves right about now. Sure, at first glance, he seemed like the perfect candidate to run against Donald Trump. He, like the president, is a successful New York businessman. Bloomberg was mayor of New York and a one-time Republican. He could be a moderate candidate to counter Sanders’ far-left agenda.

But Bloomberg might not be able to win over Democrats across the country. Why? Oh, so many reasons. Last week, a video came out where Bloomberg said that cops need to “throw kids against the wall” in order to frisk them for drugs and weapons. He said cops need to target minority communities.

Now, more videos are surfacing, revealing Bloomberg to be a cold, liberal elitist who looks down on anyone that’s not a West Coast/East Coast, latte-sipping technocrat.

The latest in this string of oppo-dumps occurred over the weekend in a video featuring Bloomberg implying that farmers and factory workers are stupid…

“It’s a process. You dig a hole, you put a seed in, you put dirt on top, add water, up comes the corn..”

Bloomberg went on to say that these people could set up “a guillotine someday” if they did not find dignity in the job they are given or fail to grasp the governing factors in the information economy. [Source: Daily Wire]

Yeah, you read that right. Bloomberg is saying farming is easy and any idiot can do it. He went on to insult blue collar workers who work in factories.

According to Bloomberg’s tiny brain, if you can train someone to do something, it must not be a difficult job.
Something tells me farming is much harder than he describes. Agriculture has developed over thousands of years. Modern farming requires advanced technology and techniques, not to mention knowledge of the land and years of experience.

I’d like to see how Bloomberg would fair out in the fields for a day.

It gets worse for the liberal candidate. Another video surfaced in 2011, where he was trashing black and Hispanic young men.

“Blacks and Latinos score terribly in school testing compared to whites and Asians. If you look at our jails, it’s predominantly minorities,” Bloomberg said, later adding that “virtually all” perpetrators and victims of crime were minorities. [Source: Daily Wire]

He goes on to say that black and Hispanic men don’t know how to find jobs and don’t know how to behave in the workplace.

Ouch. While Bloomberg is pointing to well-known statistics about crime and poverty, the comments aren’t great. He’s suggesting that most—if not all—black and Hispanic men commit crimes and don’t want honest work.

Those kinds of comments don’t go over well with Democrats. Especially from a white billionaire who is supposed to support their social justice view of the world. All that liberal voters (particularly minorities) will see is another elitist—maybe even a racist.

Even if Bloomberg meant well in these videos, you can’t ignore the sense of distain he has for people that aren’t like him. He’s dismissive of hard-working Americans from humble careers. He looks down on minorities, especially young black men, who come from the inner city. And he has embraced un-Constitutional tactics because he thinks that’s the only way to bring order to our communities.

This billionaire is nothing like Donald Trump, who actually cares about all Americans. He considers us family and works hard to put us first.

But will the media acknowledge Bloomberg’s views? Or will they try to ignore all this?

Something tells me, this will be hard to hide.

For years, liberal cities have defied federal law by protecting criminal aliens. These “sanctuary” cities and states put illegal immigrants ahead of law-abiding Americans. President Trump has had enough. He is enlisting the aid of an elite group of troops that will finally blow the lid off this leftist scheme.

It might come a surprise to learn that Democrats used to crack down on illegals, hard. But these days, they follow Obama’s lead in protecting illegal aliens. It seems there’s nothing Democrats won’t do to hide illegals from the federal government.

In sanctuary cities (and states), illegal immigrants enjoy protections American citizens can only dream of. Criminal aliens aren’t reported to ICE for deportation (even though they often commit violent crimes). On top of that, states like Los Angeles work overtime to provide illegals with free shelter, food and clothing, and health care.

Meanwhile, our veterans are living in the streets.

President Trump has been fighting to turn around this travesty of justice. He is determined to reform our immigration system and reward legal immigrants and deport illegal ones. Democrats, right on cue, have continued to prioritize illegals over everyone else.

So, Trump is making a move that will have illegals running back over the border.

The Trump administration is deploying an elite unit of the Border Patrol, including 100 Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers, to assist Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) apprehend illegal aliens in sanctuary cities.

Members of the Border Patrol Tactical Unit (BORTAC) will be helping ICE officers arrest illegal aliens living at large in sanctuary cities…

BORTAC isn’t the only special unit being deployed across the country. In total, 50 Border Patrol agents and 50 Office of Field Operations officers are part of Customs and Border Patrol’s (CBP) deployment. These 100 individuals come from a slate of different areas within CBP, not just BORTAC. [Source: Daily Caller]

Over the course of the next month, elite troops will be hitting sanctuary cities. This group, known as BORTAC, will be assisting ICE with their deportation efforts.

This isn’t the first time ICE has launched stings to round up criminal aliens. In the past, they’ve been very cautious about when and where they conduct their raids. Democrat mayors have broken the law to warn illegals, jeopardizing the lives of federal agents.

This time around, the New York Times first broke the news, perhaps to raise the alarm to sanctuary cities.

But there’s not much they can do. Sanctuary cities refuse to safely hand over illegal aliens. ICE is forced to conduct sweeping raids across large communities, endangering themselves and locals. These elite forces are especially trained for high-risk, dangerous situations. Which means, these aliens have little hope of getting away.

According to reports, these special troops will be hitting Chicago, New York, Atlanta, San Francisco, Los Angeles, and other major cities. All of them are Democrat-controlled cesspools, where little is done to enforce our laws.
Funny how the biggest cities, run by mostly Democrats, have the worst crime, poverty, and are overrun with illegals.

Don’t be surprised to hear about resistance from Democrats. They have fought tooth-and-nail to make sure criminal aliens are treated better in this country than you or me. They fought against the border wall. Fought against immigration reform. Hell, they shut down the government just to prevent negotiating with Trump over DACA.

Doesn’t seem like they care about finding lasting solutions, just making the problems worse.

So, Trump has no choice but to break out the big gun.

I for one, am not upset. If using BORTAC is what it takes to teach Democrats to obey our laws, so bit it.

But something tells me they won’t learn, even after this. Democrats are determined to turn our country into a lawless wasteland. They will have their way, unless they get booted out of office.

At least BORTAC will be able to kick some butt along the way.

For years, Americans have had to put up with the media accusing Trump of “colluding” with Russia. Even after he was cleared, the rumors still hang around like a shadow. But a real conspiracy was going on in 2016—one that involved Obama and his DOJ. Now, we are learning that Attorney General Barr’s top investigator is hot on the trail.

It’s no secret that Russia was up to something in 2016. The sad reality is, thanks to the partisan left, we don’t know for sure all that they tried to do. Democrats claimed Russia was working with Trump to steal the election.

That was a bald-face lie. Even Robert Mueller cleared Trump’s name, saying not a single American worked with Russia.

But Russia did try to interfere with our election. We know that a group of twelve Russian figures infiltrated social media, to spread false information about all the candidates (even going back to the primaries, attacking and helping Bernie Sanders and Ted Cruz). Was Russia doing other things? How far was their reach into American politics?

Unfortunately, the Obama administration might not have been doing a good enough job of finding out. We do know that Obama’s DOJ ignored real threats and spent much of its time trying to take down Trump’s campaign. They used a false dossier to get warrants to spy on a Trump staffer. But what about Russia?

Now we are learning that Obama’s administration did know about Russian interference. In fact, the CIA in particular was aware of actions by the foreign power to mess with our democracy. But the agency may have hid the details from other agencies—letting Russia get away with it.

A.G. Barr is none too pleased. And he’s sending his bulldog after the facts.

U.S. Attorney John Durham is reportedly investigating if Obama administration officials hid or manipulated evidence about what they knew about Russia’s election interference in the 2016 U.S. elections…

“Mr. Durham appears to be pursuing a theory that the C.I.A., under its former director John O. Brennan, had a preconceived notion about Russia or was trying to get to a particular result — and was nefariously trying to keep other agencies from seeing the full picture lest they interfere with that goal.”

Buried deep in the report, the Times revealed that officials had fought over access to emails that the Russian government had previously hacked, which included emails from former President Barack Obama…

“Multiple foreign governments hacked Barack Obama’s email while he was president, which could explain why James Comey was so eager to make the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s illegal private email scheme go away.” [Source: Daily Wire]

Wow, talk about a bombshell. We do know that Russia was on an email-hacking spree back in 2016. But we had no idea that they got their hands on emails from the president and Congress!

Shouldn’t be too big of a surprise. Hillary’s illegal private server had been hacked many times. She was probably communicating with many leaders, including the president. If Russia targeted her server, then they could have gotten a hold of emails (and documents) from many people.

Yet the CIA and FBI tried to cover all this up. One, so they wouldn’t look bad in the press. And the other, so the Russia’s schemes could actually come to fruition. Reports suggest that John Brennan, the former head of the CIA, may have hid or changes documents in order to keep Russia’s antics in the dark.

Perhaps Brennan knew what Russia was up to and wanted them to continue. Why? Because he might have wanted to use what he learned to take down Trump. Or perhaps he wanted the FBI to look bad.

Either case, this opens up a big can of worms for the Obama administration. All kinds of shady things were going on. And the top investigator is hot on the trail.

Hopefully, the full scope of their crimes will come to light soon.

With two states reporting in, the confused, bland, and uninspiring Democratic primaries are finally taking shape. All signs point to Bernie Sanders taking a commanding lead, perhaps even clinching the nomination. But a new poll from Gallup was recently released. It gauges what kind of candidates the American people are willing to elect. Sanders should be getting pretty upset right now.

It’s no secret that the Democratic establishment do not want Bernie Sanders nominated. In the weeks leading up to the Iowa caucuses, there was an obvious effort by the media to crush him. Remember the seemingly invented scandal between Sanders and Elizabeth Warren? CNN was behind that scheme, in which they tried to stain him as a sexist.

Other notable Democrats came out swinging against the Democratic socialist. It seems that as Joe Biden’s chances got slimmer and slimmer, the establishment on the left got more and more worried that Sanders could take it all away.

Even Barack Obama expressed concern if Sanders was elected. An infamous meeting in New York late last year brought key donors together, discussing if they could convince someone, anyone, to run. That meeting of the “minds” is want probably prompted Mike Bloomberg to start spending away his fortune on campaign ads.

Yet even with all his money, the momentum is in Sanders’ favor.

Democrats have very good reason to worry. Sure, Sanders’ rabid supporters love him—most of them are pot-smoking anarchists. But it doesn’t seem like the general population is interested in electing a self-described socialist to the highest office in the land.

And now, we have a Gallup poll to prove it.

According to a Gallup survey released yesterday, “[m]ore than 90% of Americans say they would be happy to vote for a presidential candidate their party nominated who would be black, Catholic, Hispanic, Jewish or a woman; 80% would accept evangelical Christians, homosexual men, and lesbians; 60-70% are willing to embrace a presidential candidate who is under 40, over 70, a Muslim or an atheist; but only 45% say they would vote for a socialist for president,”

As Gallup noted at the top of its report, socialists are the “one group tested” who “receive[] majority opposition.” After all, “[l]ess than half of Americans, 45%, say they would vote for a socialist for president, while 53% say they would not.” [Source: Daily Wire]

Ouch. Only 45% of those asked said they were willing to vote for a socialist. In fact, it seems Americans are more than willing to elect a black, Catholic, gay, or lesbian president. But not a socialist! No sir!

That’s got to be humbling, right? Most Americans say they’d elect a gay person (from within their own party) over a person who embraces Karl Marx’s economy system.

I can’t blame ‘em. Bernie Sanders says there shouldn’t be billionaires. Yet he wants to tax billionaires to pay for his free health care and college tuition. Sanders wants to enact heavy environmental regulation that would damage major industries. Plus, he wants open borders so that illegal immigrants can take whatever jobs are left.

Bring on the gays! If it means we can keep taxes low, protect our borders, and preserve America’s capitalist heritage.

This is why Obama has even threatened to “get involved” if Sanders started getting a lead. Even the socialist-leaning former president knows most Americans won’t get on board for Uncle Bernie’s crazy ideas.

Perhaps that’s why so many are predicted a contested convention. The party is hoping Bloomberg can steal enough votes so that, going into the summer, there won’t be a clear nominee. Then, perhaps the powers that run the party can do a little bit of voodoo and ensure Sanders doesn’t get the nomination.

An underhanded strategy, but it’s the only option they have left. It’s either that, or give the party over to a radical socialist that is endorsed by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
Scary stuff.

Patriots celebrated when Donald Trump fired turncoat NSC member Alexander Vindman. The former White House staffer had thrown Trump under the bus when he testified against him during the House impeachment inquiry. But word was, Vindman would have just been transferred to another cushy Pentagon role. Not if the president has anything to say about it.

The House’s bogus impeachment of Donald Trump did very little to hurt the president. It did, however, expose a number of White House staff whose loyalties were not for the president nor the country. These swamp dwellers were all too eager to preen before House Democrats giving their opinions on Trump’s contact with Ukraine—as if their imaginations counted as evidence.

Now, these traitors are facing swift backlash. Seventy White House staffers have been shown the door, including former Ambassador Sondland (who tried to screw Trump, even though he admitted the president wanted no quid-pro-quo).

Perhaps the biggest ham of the House inquiries was Alex Vindman. Although he served as a civilian in the National Security Council, he stuffed himself into his Army uniform to testify. Many in the military noted how inappropriate and odd this was. Clearly the man wanted to give himself more credibility than he deserved.

Vindman attempted to frame the president by saying his phone call with Ukraine was inappropriate. He could not provide real evidence that Trump committed an impeachable offence, but the potato-faced goon still threw Trump under the bus.

Once the Senate acquitted Trump of all charges, the gloves came off. Vindman—and his brother—were fired from their White House posts. But the story doesn’t end there. Looks like pudgy o’ Vindman will face more consequences for his actions.

President Trump on Tuesday suggested that the Pentagon should review the conduct of a former White House national security aide who played a central role in the Democrats’ impeachment case and potentially consider disciplinary action against him…

Asked whether he wanted to see Vindman face discipline, Trump said military officials “can handle him any way they want” but also suggested that he expected commanders to review the decorated, 20-year officer’s conduct.

“That’s going to be up the military,” Trump said. “We’ll have to see. They are certainly, I imagine, going to take a look at that.” [Source: Fox News]

Officially, Vindman wasn’t fired because of his testimony against the president. Oh, there were so many more reason this guy got canned.

Vindman has a history of insubordination and severe lack of judgment. His reputation goes all the back to his cadet days. Fellow students remember him as a pig who ate all their food, someone who only worked when he was in the spotlight, and someone who performed so badly that they wanted him peered out.

How this man ended up in the White House is anyone’s guess. It probably has something to do with Barack Obama’s legacy of distain for the military and his tendency to promote incompetence.

But let’s be honest here. Vindman was supposed to serve the president and uphold the role of a National Security Council member. His job was to improve our national security. Instead, he appeared before the cameras to jeopardize our national security by attacking the Commander in Chief.

Would have Obama tolerated such behavior? Would any member of Congress put up with that from one of their staff?
This man is a part of the military, to boot. Should the Pentagon look the other way, after this man tried to take down the president over bogus charges?

If I were Vindman’s superior, I would make sure he regretted his self-serving, un-American, and disgusting actions. I will see to it that he was made an example of.

But that’s just me. The Pentagon heads are much, much stricter.

Ad Blocker Detected!

Advertisements fund this website. Please disable your adblocking software or whitelist our website.
Thank You!