Life And Liberty News


As Joe Biden continues his rise to the top of a remarkably corrupt Democratic party, his son, Hunter Biden, continues to lurk in the shadows doing god knows what.

Hunter Biden cant’ seem to stay out of trouble, however, as he has made his way back into the headlines after defying a court order to turn over his financial information, flaunting his lack of “respect” for the legal process and undermining the interests of the child he has previously refused to support or even acknowledge, according to a blistering new filing from the mother of Biden’s child in an ongoing paternity case.

“After months of hiding, one has to wonder if the reason Hunter Biden continues to defy the court is because there are financial documents that could shed light on his father’s massive conflicts of interest as vice president,” Republican National Committee (RNC) spokesman Steve Guest pointed out to Fox News on Sunday.

The filing from 28-year-old Lunden Alexis Roberts’ legal team wastes little time in charging that Hunter Biden “continues to act as though he has no respect for this Court, its orders, the legal process in this state, or the needs of his child for support.” It argues that the court “should take some action that will make the defendant follow court orders and a believer in the rule of law.”

Specifically, Biden has not turned over information concerning his address, financial institutions he or his businesses use, a list of all the companies he “currently owns or in which he has an ownership interest and the state in which those companies are incorporated,” or a list of “all sources of income for the past five years.”

Additionally, Biden has failed to produce a list of all “employers for the past five years,” an unredacted copy of his tax returns, deeds for properties he owns, and tax documents for companies in which he has any ownership interest.

Biden’s conduct is “willful and contemptuous,” according to Roberts’ lawyers, and he should be ordered to appear in person at a March 13 hearing to explain why he should not be held in contempt.

The New York Times reported last week that the 50-year-old Hunter Biden is spending his time attempting to pass himself off as a painter in a rented $12,000-per-month hideout in Hollywood Hills while driving a Porsche.

The paternity dispute has presented headaches for the elder Biden ever since a court filing showed that DNA results indicated he was now a grandfather. Joe Biden tangled with a Fox News reporter on camera when asked about that development last November.

“I’m wondering if you have a comment on this report, and court filing, out of Arkansas, that your son Hunter just made you a grandfather again,” Fox News’ Peter Doocy asked.

“No, that’s a private matter and I have no comment,” Biden fired back before attacking the reporter. Only you would ask that,” a flustered Biden responded. “You’re a good man. You’re a good man. Classy.”

On the other side of the isle – Donald Trump Jr. issued a fierce challenge to shady Hunter Biden during an interview on Sunday to a debate before the upcoming 2020 presidential election.

Trump made the remarks in an interview with Axios on what the line of attack would be on Joe Biden if Joe Biden became the Democratic nominee for president.

“Off the top of my head, it’s multiple fold, right,” Trump said. “First of all, you have sort of just a guy that’s telling us he’s going to do all these things, he’s gonna do them. But he’s been in politics for 50 years. Why hasn’t he done them then?”

“The second part of that is, you know, if Donald Trump mixed up Iowa and Ohio – once – the media, and you know where I’m going on this one, right guys?” Trump continued. “The media would be on TV, every tele-psychologist would say, ‘Donald Trump has lost his mind. Donald, he’s in the later stages of dementia and a combination of Alzheimer’s. He’s not fit to run.’ Joe Biden doesn’t know what state he’s in 50% of the time. If Donald Trump did the equivalent, you would not hear anything other than that.”

“How much will his son be a part of that, Hunter? It’s obviously been a big part,” Axios’ Jim VandeHei asked Trump.

“Listen, I think it’s got to be a big part,” Trump responded. “I was an international business person before my father got into politics. That’s what we did. I’m not going to say I haven’t benefited from my father’s last name, just like Hunter Biden did. I’d be foolish to say that. But I haven’t benefited from my father’s taxpayer-funded office, okay?”

“Hunter Biden, his father becomes VP, all of a sudden he goes over to the Ukraine,” Trump continued. “And he’s making $83 grand a month. So, you know, the media likes to do this sort of false equivalence. ‘You you’re doing this, you’re doing that.’”

“We stopped doing any new international business deals when my father won the presidency. So, you know what would be great? I’ll let you host it. You moderate a debate between Hunter Biden and myself. C’mon. Let’s do it.”

“No, no, seriously. We can go full transparency. We show everything and we can talk about all of the places where I’m supposedly grifting, but Hunter Biden isn’t. I would love to do it.”

The media has been spending lots of time covering the seemingly unending Democratic primaries. They really seem to believe one of those goons will become the next president. But Donald Trump has something to say about that. During a town hall event, the president called out his would-be rivals. It was priceless.

The Democratic primaries seem to have been going on for years, now. It was about a year ago when the first candidates announced they were throwing their hats into the ring. Over twenty Democrats ran for president—an extraordinarily crowded field. The media tried to subject us to their endless debates (thank God for Netflix).
Only for it to come down to too very old, very white, candidates.

We watched the establishment media try to throw their weight behind anyone but Bernie Sanders. Early on, they were backing Joe Biden. Then they switched to Elizabeth Warren. But neither looked good enough to beat Trump. Then Mike Bloomberg entered the race, spending hundreds of millions of his own money. Now, after all that stuff and nonsense, they’re back to Biden.

Donald Trump called out his wanna be rivals during last night’s town hall event. He had some strong words for these Democrats who think they could take his job.

President Trump, speaking at a Fox News Town Hall in Joe Biden’s hometown of Scranton, Pa., on Thursday evening, openly suggested that the new Democratic front-runner’s repeated gaffes could be a sign of a competency issue — honing a line of attack that Republicans are expected to repeatedly deploy if Biden becomes his party’s nominee…

Trump went on to argue that Biden was “damaged” by the impeachment process that implicated his son Hunter in apparent overseas corruption while Biden was vice president. “They aimed at Trump and they took Biden down,” the president said…

“I’m all set for Bernie, communist,” Trump began. “And then we have this crazy thing that happened on Tuesday, which he thought was Thursday. But he also said 150 million people were killed with guns, and that he was running for the U.S. Senate — there’s something going on there.” [Source: Fox News]

Trump laid into Joe Biden, questioning his mental fortitude after a series of public gaffes. He also called out Bernie, calling him what we all know he is: a communist. Trump questioned why Elizabeth Warren dropped out after Super Tuesday, suggesting she deliberately hurt Bernie’s chances.

Of all the Democratic candidates, you have to wonder about Joe Biden. The Democratic Party originally wasn’t too happy about him entering the race. Before he made his announcement, the media came out with hit pieces of his inappropriate treatment of women. It’s clear they were trying to out him with a “Me Too” scandal. They were cagey about supporting him after he entered the race.

The controversy surrounding Ukraine has left lingering questions about Joe Biden and his family. Just what were they up to with Burisma? These are things that have yet to be answered—even though Democrats impeached Trump over it.
Now, we have to worry about Biden’s mental capacity. The Democrats and their media allies have all but written off Bernie Sanders. They are throwing their weight behind Joe Biden—as if he’s their last savior. But the man keeps making concerning gaffes—one worse than the last.

Isn’t anyone in the mainstream media concerned over his mental health? Do they really want to back a man for president—who might be suffering from something very serious?

It seems like only President Trump is voicing concern. Naturally, the left will say he’s only doing so because he might be running against him. But what do the American people think?

Are you concerned that Joe Biden might be slipping? Do you think he’s mentally fit to be president?
I think I know the answers to those.

The Supreme Court decided to take up an ongoing case over an abortion law in Louisiana. The ruling could have significant impact on the practice throughout the country. Worried his party’s most coveted agenda was at risk, Chuck Schumer openly threatened two Supreme Court Justices. Now, he’s facing backlash from all sides.

By now, you’ve probably heard about the insane things Chuck Schumer said about Supreme Court Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh. If not, let me enlighten you. During at abortion rally outside the Supreme Court, Schumer threatened the Trump appointed-justices to vote his way, or else.

“I want to tell you, Gorsuch. I want to tell you, Kavanaugh. You have released the whirlwind, and you will pay the price. You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.”

Damn. I’ve seen and heard a lot of crazy stuff since I started writing about politics. But this might take the cake. A long-serving Democrat senator openly threatened two Supreme Court justices over an ongoing trial. He literally said, “You will pay the price.”

How can anyone think this was appropriate? As it turns out, quite a few people were outraged by this, including the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.

Chief Justice of the United States John Roberts on Wednesday issued a highly unusual and forceful rebuke to Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., calling his threatening remarks directed at Associate Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh “irresponsible” and “dangerous.” [Source: Fox News]

The president himself said Schumer made a “direct and dangerous” threat to the Supreme Court. He demanded action be taken.

Already Schumer’s colleagues are responding. Sen. Josh Hawley is planning to introduce a motion to censure Chuck for his comments. Considering the Senate’s Republican majority, it just might pass.

But Hawley might get some support from the left. Because even a few Democrats are shocked by Schumer’s words.

“Threatening a sitting Justice regardless of their politics is dangerous,” [Jimmy] Williams tweeted. “What Schumer said is gross inappropriate and unacceptable. He should clarify his words immediately or step down from leadership. We must be better than this.”

Another liberal, law professor Lawrence Tribe, also criticized Schumer, saying his remarks were “inexcusable.” Even Democrat Jonathan Turley called out Schumer, saying he sounded like a “stalker.”

Why are so many people—on the left and right—condemning the man? Politicians say crazy things against rivals all the time, right? Well, this time, it’s very different. Gorsuch and Kavanaugh are members of the third branch of the federal government. As justices of the Supreme Court, they are separated from the powers of Congress and the White House.

They are required to do their job without bias—and interference—from the other two branches. It would be wrong for the president or a lawmaker to tell justices how to rule. In fact, it would be wildly inappropriate and illegal.
Schumer went way beyond just telling them. He, before a crowd and captured on video for the world to see, threatened two justices over a case. He made it very clear that there would be consequences if these two conservative justices ruled in a way Schumer didn’t like.

What could those consequences be? Schumer can’t “fire” a Supreme Court justice. He can’t impeach them over a ruling. How else are we going to interpret his words, but as a promise of violence? Democrats are known for inciting violence against conservatives. News outlets like CNN have “doxed” conservatives, exposing them to danger.

Would Schumer—or his office—create a situation where Gorsuch and Kavanaugh were vulnerable to attack? Guess what, he already did. His words might motivate unstable persons to want to harm these to respected justices.

Which is exactly why Chuck said them. He should face a serious penalty for what he did. It can only be considered criminal.

Since entering office, Donald Trump has donated his salary to various agencies. In light of the recent coronavirus outbreak, the president is sending his quarterly salary to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. You’d think that would win him appreciation from the mainstream media, right? Wrong. Democrats got downright nasty with their responses.

President Trump hasn’t taken a single dollar from his stint in the White House. Most career politicians are filthy rich by the time they leave office (only to get richer in the years to follow). But by all measures, Trump will have considerably less wealth after he finishes his tenure as president. Trump dissolved his business concerns before entering office. He no longer owns Trump Enterprises. And he gives away his salary every quarter.

He’s consistently given his paycheck to government agencies. Not only does that help these groups, but it raises awareness to their causes and work. This quarter, he’s giving his check to the Department of Health and Human Services, as a sign of support for their battle against the coronavirus.

Conservative Americans were quick to thank Trump for the generous contribution. But liberals must be really suffering a strong case of TDS, these days. Because a simple act like donating his paycheck really brought out the ugly in them. Not that it’s hard to do.

Not everyone was pleased with the news of Trump donating his salary to help fight the virus; on the contrary, some liberals were enraged, even finding it appropriate to compare the POTUS to Hitler.

“Hitler never took a salary,” posted Mike P. Williams. “Now show his tax returns and document the millions he’s rinsed the tax payer for in terms of staying at his own properties, golf carts, and security for Eric.”

Crooked Media host Akilah Hughes complained, “This pays for tests for less than 50 people.”

“How do we get back the hundreds of millions he’s wasted golfing,” said left-wing writer Thor Benson…
Left-wing actress and singer Kelly Mantle falsely contended that Trump did not actually donate the money…
“Trump’s [press secretary] is trying to convince us that [Donald Trump] is donating his salary to fight Coronavirus. But the check is dated 01/29/20?” …

(The check was for the fourth-quarter of 2019, which ended on December 31.) [Source: Daily Wire]

When all else fails, call Trump Hitler. Geez, these leftists’ attacks are really getting tired and stale, huh? Apparently a common attack was to say Trump’s wasted tax dollars golfing and that he is getting rich by going to Trump properties.

Of course, these accusations are baseless. Trump spends as much time golfing as Obama or Clinton did. And chances are, Trump properties aren’t charging the government for his stays.

But far be it for the left to miss an opportunity to lie about Trump! The man is literally giving away money and they still bitch. They weren’t too upset when Obama got rich of his time in office. The man bought a multi-million-dollar house on the water. Where did they think he got that money?

Trump donates money to fight a disease and the left accuses him of being a criminal. Do these people still live in reality—or are all they all doped up on opioids?

We shouldn’t be too surprised, though. They are watching their own party tear itself to shreds. Faced with the reality that there might not be a Democratic Party soon, what else can they do?

It looks very likely they have a brokered convention in the summer—meaning an all-but-certain loss in November. Worse than losing the White House are the many down-ballot seats that will be taken by Trump-loving Republicans.

Democrats don’t have much to look forward to, these days. Catching the coronavirus might have been their last ticket out. But even that is unlikely, thanks to the efforts of the Trump administration.

Hey, maybe that’s why they’re really mad!

Hillary Clinton skirted out of serious consequences when the FBI dropped their investigation into her illegal email server. Americans were shocked to find this would-be president would face no punishment, despite her wrongful activities. But it looks like, after all these years, Clinton will finally be forced to own up to her actions. A federal judge is making sure.

Many Americans have demanded justice over former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s behavior. We all remember what she did during the Benghazi siege. Because of her direct actions, American lives were lost overseas. She never faced retribution.

Still more Americans want answers over Hillary Clinton’s illegal email server. She flagrantly broke the law when she set up a private email server to handle State Department communications. She sent classified documents over this unsecured server—which we learned had been infiltrated by numerous foreign actors. Then-FBI Director James Comey declared to the entire country that Clinton acted irresponsibly and broke the law.

But—to the outrage of millions—he would not press charges. I guess when you’re a Democrat, you can get away with anything, huh?

Maybe the story is not entirely over. A watchdog group has been fighting for years to get answers over Clinton’s server. They have gone to court to request information regarding it. And it looks like they caught the big dog herself.

A federal judge Monday granted a request from conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch to have former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton sit for a sworn deposition to answer questions about her use of a private email server to conduct government business…

D.C. District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth said in his ruling that her past responses left much to be desired.
“As extensive as the existing record is, it does not sufficiently explain Secretary Clinton’s state of mind when she decided it would be an acceptable practice to set up and use a private server to conduct State Department business,” Lamberth said.

The judge went on to recognize that while Clinton responded to written questions in a separate case, “those responses were either incomplete, unhelpful, or cursory at best. Simply put her responses left many more questions than answers.” Lamberth said. [Source: Fox News]

After all these years, Hillary Clinton will have to answer questions, in person, about her illegal private email server. You know this was the last thing she wanted to do—especially as the election heats up.
(Some say she might jump in at the last second and run… or at least meddle to some extent.)

The judge ruled that past “answers” she provided were not sufficient. In fact, she raised more questions than answers. I think we all know why she’s been so evasive.

Many believe she set up the server in the first place to facility a “pay-for-play” deal through the State Department. There’s evidence to suggest Clinton was selling access to herself and the agency to foreign donors and the rich elite. They would give money to her “Foundation” and suddenly, they got deals from the State Department.
All that needed to be setup somehow. And she couldn’t arrange such acts of bribery through official channels. A secret email server would hide those messages from the administration.

In fact, when the FBI got wind of the server and demanded Hillary to hand it over, she deleted 33,000 messages. Her staff proceeded to destroy their phones with hammers.

Oh, nothing suspicious about that!

It’s shocking that none of this has ever been properly investigated. Only now, after so much time has passed, is one group trying to get to the bottom of it.

But will Clinton talk? Or will she find another excuse to avoid copping to the truth?

I guess we’ll find out.

After the Senate acquitted Donald Trump of the left’s impeachment charges, House Democrats said they were not giving up. They vowed to launch more investigations against the Trump administration. Some said they would even be prepared to impeach him again and again. But it looks like they were all talk, as weeks later they’ve admitted defeat.

Astute observers knew from the start that impeachment was a bogus fraud. I can’t say that Democrats were hoping to actually remove Trump from office. But it was clear their impeachment plans were half-baked at best.

We’ve gone over it again and again. Pelosi impeached Trump just to protect her own job from radical primary challengers. She and House Democrats talked a big talk about “protecting the Constitution.” But experts agreed they put together the weakest case for impeachment in the history of the United States.

They shouldn’t have been surprised that the Senate voted to acquit. Yet even today, these con artists insist that Trump is an illegitimate president and a law break. They vowed to keep searching for dirt on the administration. Pelosi said on numerous occasions Trump was “impeached forever.”

But it seems now, they’ve all but given up.

Despite their dire warnings earlier this year that President Trump’s foreign policy endangered the United States and assured that the 2020 elections would be riddled with foreign election interference, House Democrats have now essentially dropped their investigative efforts into the Trump administration’s Ukraine dealings.

The drawdown, which has seen Democrats decline to make new witness requests or file relevant subpoenas since the conclusion of the Senate impeachment trial, could be a tacit acknowledgement that the probes wouldn’t be politically helpful as the 2020 presidential field narrows. Amid impeachment proceedings, a Gallup poll found that support for both President Trump and the Republican Party had risen to historic highs. [Source: Fox News]

Democrats claimed they would prepare investigations on every little thing Trump did or said. Remember how they were going to get him over comments about Roger Stone’s trial? Pelosi even said they would go after AG Bill Barr in retribution. Where did all that go?

House Democrat promised more subpoenas and hearings. All that’s gone away.

Perhaps it has something to do with the fact that nobody, ever believed in their impeachment hoax. Defying all their hopes and dreams, Donald Trump’s popularity soared during and after impeachment. He raised a record amount of cash immediately after Pelosi announced the inquiry, a trend that only continued into this year.

His approval soared, especially after the Senate trial. You only have to see the mammoth crowds at his events to know that Americans are rallying around the president.

Meanwhile, the Democrats are limping along. Pete Buttigieg finally dropped out of the presidential race, probably after pressure from the party. As Sanders gains more steam, the left is panicking. A brokered convention might be in their future, meaning a sure defeat in November.

Can you imagine what would happen in the House wasted the next precious few months on another impeachment? Just as the election heated up, they tried to attention away from the candidates, debates, and events with another round of bogus nonsense!

Something tells me the party heads dropped a hammer on Pelosi and House Democrats. Their first impeachment failed spectacularly. A second would be a disaster.

Keep in mind, the only reason they impeached Trump was to help the party’s chances in 2020. It was the first time Congress impeached a first-term president. Clearly, it was only to hurt his reputation going into re-election. But from all signs, it’s helped him.

I guess Democrats learned one little lesson from all this: wrongful impeachment doesn’t work.
They are going to just have to live with their bad candidates and let the chips fall where they may.
Meaning: a Republican majority in D.C.

As news of the coronavirus spreading continues, the media stokes the flames of fear and panic. Democrats have tried to lie about the virus, to hurt the president prop up their political careers. But the administration has been at work since day one. And Vice President Pence offers some much-needed insight.

Is there anything more pathetic than spreading worries about a disease, just to score political points? I don’t know, you’d have to ask the Democrats. In their desperate bid to topple Trump, they’ve been making the news about the coronavirus sound much worse than it is. Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer have ignored the steps Trump has taken to protect Americans.

Worse than that, Joe Biden and Mike Bloomberg openly lied about Trump’s response to the outbreak. Even the Associated Press, which is no fan of the president, had to expose the dishonesty of these 2020 candidates.

An Associated Press fact check confirms what Breitbart News reported earlier this week: that Democrat presidential candidates are falsely claiming that President Donald Trump cut funding and personnel needed to fight coronavirus…

“Democratic presidential contenders are describing the federal infectious-disease bureaucracy as rudderless and ill-prepared for the coronavirus threat because of budget cuts and ham-handed leadership by President Donald Trump. That’s a distorted picture.” [Source: Breitbart]

It’s all an orchestrated attack so you would panic over a virus that is causing very little damage worldwide (unless you’re in China). The facts remain that unless you are of an advanced age and have a weak immune system, you have nothing to worry about.

But that won’t stop the media from hyping up this virus in the coming weeks. These pathetic news outlets need something to get you to click on their links. And if it contributes to a faltering stock market and bruised economy—hurting Trump’s re-election chances—all the more reason to lie.

The Vice President was not willing to let these con artists have the upper hand. In a recent interview, he made it clear that the United States has nothing to fear from this virus.

During an interview aired on Thursday’s broadcast of the Fox News Channel’s “Hannity,” Vice President Mike Pence declared that “The risk of the spread of the coronavirus in the United States of America remains low.”

… ”And it’s a direct result of the unprecedented action that President Trump took last month, when he closed our border to Chinese individuals coming into the country and also established a quarantining effort. Our White House Coronavirus Task Force has literally been meeting every day for the last six weeks. And the American people can be confident that we’re going to bring, at the president’s direction, the full resources of the federal government to bear to protect the people of this country.” [Source: Breitbart]

Long before the media was hyping up this virus, the administration was taking action. Closing our borders was perhaps the smartest thing we could have done. Trump ordered that long before any other country was even preparing. That eliminated the biggest threat to the spread of this disease in the United States.

On top of that, Trump instituted quarantine measures, so that anyone coming from outside the country would have been examined and cleared.

These are basic measures that can ensure the United States won’t face the “pandemic” of this virus. Measures that none of the Democrats thought of or endorsed. Instead, they rely on the dishonest media to distort the news, so none of us feel safe.

How’s that for leadership?

As the rest of the world freaks out and possibly blunders their response, Americans can rest easy. We have leaders that work around the clock, diligently doing their job. That’s a far cry from past administrations, that worried more about how the media covered them, then our well-being.

Imagine how this crisis would have played out, if Bernie Sanders’ was president? God help us.

The mainstream media has been publishing negative news stories about Donald Trump since he announced his candidacy. They are so determined to hurt his presidency, that they’ve earned the notorious title of “fake news.” Yet there seems to be little repercussions for their endless stream of phony stories. Until now. The Trump campaign is hitting the biggest paper for one of their worst articles.

Can the mainstream media stoop any lower than it already has? Seriously, their respect among Americans is so low, saying it’s in the toilet would be a compliment. We all know the major media outlets in this country lean hard to the left. The notion of fair and objective reporting is just a thing of the past.

That’s been true for a long time, but it’s never been more obvious than since Trump entered politics. The Democrats that run the MSM hate the man so much, they don’t even try to hide their bias against him. Major networks, newspapers, and websites spew dozens of hit pieces against him a day. The vast majority of their coverage of Donald Trump (93%) is negative. Very little of what they report is provable or accurate.

But when a particularly nasty hit piece is exposed as fake news, they rarely offer a retraction. When they do, it doesn’t get nearly the same attention as the original lie.

For a long time, the media has hidden behind the First Amendment to get away with their slander. After all, freedom of the press means the government can’t really interfere with the news (a joke, when you consider how many media executives are former government officials, or have spouses currently in government). They think this means they can print anything they want, without consequences.

But the Trump campaign just proved them wrong, big time.

The Trump campaign has filed a libel lawsuit against what it called the “extremely biased” New York Times, saying the paper’s March 27, 2019 op-ed titled “The Real Trump-Russia Quid Pro Quo” amounted to a knowingly false smear intended to “improperly influence the presidential election in November 2020.”

“They did a bad thing,” Trump said at a coronavirus press conference later Wednesday, before apparently promising more litigation. “There will be more coming. There will be more coming.”

The lawsuit seeks “compensatory damages in the millions of dollars,” as well as punitive damages and legal fees. Knowing that then-Special Counsel Robert Mueller was about to exonerate President Trump, the campaign argues in the lawsuit, the Times sought to quickly “damage” the president’s campaign “before the Mueller Report would be released debunking the conspiracy claims.” [Source: Fox News]

The Times article claimed (without evidence, of course) that Trump accepted help from Russia in 2016, in exchange for a change in foreign policy. The article framed Trump as a colluder and cheater, who stole the election from Hillary Clinton.

Even though we know for a fact that Trump did not collude with Russia. Robert Mueller had to admit this after his exhaustingly-long investigation.

The New York Times willingly lied to hurt the Trump re-election campaign, the lawsuit claims. President Trump is finally hitting back at the fake news for their years of smearing and slander. He promised “there will be more coming,” to boot.

If I was a fake news journalist, I’d be very worried right now. These clowns know just how dishonest they’ve been. They practically manufacture “sources” to make the Trump administration look bad. It’s hard to call their reporting anything more than spin or outright lies. The mainstream media, today, is essentially the propaganda wing of the Democratic Party.

But it all might be coming to an end, soon.

The outcome of this lawsuit can set a precedent within the media. If Trump wins and gets millions from the Times, every other lying news outlet is vulnerable. They might be facing many suits—and not just from Trump.

Will they learn their lesson and change their ways? Let’s just say… I’m not holding my breath.

President Trump enjoyed a historic and winning visit to the nation of India. While there, he celebrated the two allies’ strong relationship. But apparently, a left-wing reporter tried to use it as an opportunity to slam Trump over his “Muslim ban.” The president wasn’t having any of that and put the fake news hawker in his place.

It never fails to amaze me how dishonest the mainstream media can be. After all these years, with tanking subscriptions and low ratings, you’d think they would start being honest. Just a little bit, to save their skins. But nope! The liberal media’s agenda to destroy the Trump administration compels them to push the same, tired lies again and again. Turning off millions of potential viewers.

If you don’t believe me, just look at the never-dying Russian hoax. Even after Mueller himself cleared Trump of colluding with the foreign power, Democrats and the media still claim Trump is a Putin agent. Recently, they even claimed Russia was helping Sanders win the primary, so Trump could win re-election easier.


Another lie they like to push is concerning Trump’s “Muslim ban.” You might remember that early on in his administration, Trump signed an executive order that temporarily halted entry from countries with known ties to terrorism. It was based on a list compiled by the Obama administration. Immediately, the media called it a Muslim ban (even though 95% of the Muslim world wasn’t on the list).

Democrats tried to oppose this move, bringing it all the way to the Supreme Court. They lost.

Recently, a BBC reporter brought up this “Muslim ban” to Trump while in India. Perhaps this goon thought he could shame the president after enjoy what could only be called a lovefest with the Indian people and leaders. This clown thought casting Trump as some kind of anti-Muslim bigot would spoil all the fun. Trump schooled him quite effectively.

President Donald Trump corrected a reporter on Tuesday for suggesting his travel ban from certain countries was discriminatory against Muslims.

A BBC reporter used his time at a press conference in India with President Trump to claim many had hoped he would confront Indian Prime Minister Modi on policies and hate crimes in India affecting Muslims, but also claimed his travel ban in the United States was discriminatory against Muslims

“The travel ban is not a thing against Muslims,” Trump replied. “It’s a thing against areas where we don’t want people coming into our country that are going to cause problems, cause harm, cause death, hurt our people. I feel very strong about that.”

Trump reminded the reporter the travel ban was deemed legal by the Supreme Court.

“We won the travel ban, and we used the travel ban where we think there was, not based on religion, but where we think there’s going to be trouble,” he said. [Source: Breitbart]

Once again, a fake news peddler pushed the lie that Trump banned Muslims from entering the country. We know that was not true. Even the executive order did not mention Muslims or religion. Yet liberals continue to blatantly lie about it. It’s as if they think we’re stupid, just believing whatever fiction they make up.

President Trump put this con artist in his place. He reminded this “journalist” that the ban was targetting terrorists who want to “cause harm, cause death, hurt our people.” Apparently, this elitist from the BBC doesn’t care when innocent civilians are killed by terrorists. Must be why stabbings in London have reached new highs (all perpetrated by migrants).

It doesn’t matter how often we remind these clowns of the facts. They’ll keep lying about Trump and his supporters. They need to learn there are consequences to such evil. Perhaps losing political power for the next twenty years will learn them?

Only when liberals and Democrats are voted out of power, will they realize regular folks are done putting up with their schemes. At the very least, we won’t have to listen to them lie anymore.

This week, Bernie Sanders was grilled on 60 Minutes over how he’ll pay for all his socialist plans. Both Democrats and Republicans complained he could never find the money for his trillion-dollar agenda. Sanders quickly released a plan on his campaign website. In a word, it’s terrible.

Democrats are panicking over the fact that Sanders is winning their primary race. For good reason. Sanders is an open socialist. He seems to despise our capitalist economic system. You know, the system that has brought America untold wealth and prosperity?

Sanders hates billionaires, but apparently has no problem with millionaires (because he’s one of them). To win over his rabid followers, he’s promising all kinds of “free” government handouts. He wants to make college free and forgive student loan debt. Another major promise from Sanders is his “Medicare for All,” a government-run program that would put private health providers out of business.

These all sound great—if you’re a dummy who doesn’t want to pay for things. But if you’ve ever worked a day in your life, you know this all sounds too good to be true. Even Anderson Cooper demanded Sanders explain how he’d pay for all these goodies. Finally, the socialist released a plan on how he’d pay for all his government-run ideas.

Let’s just say, he’ll tank the country faster than we thought.

Bernie Sanders unexpectedly released a fact-sheet Monday night explaining that he’d pay for his sweeping new government programs through new taxes and massive lawsuits against the fossil fuel industry, as well as by slashing spending on the military, among other methods…

The plan also did not discuss how the government would be able to reliably obtain the money, given that many investments could simply be liquidated or transferred elsewhere before his administration took office…

Sanders claimed to be able to raise “$3.085 trillion by making the fossil fuel industry pay for their pollution, through litigation, fees, and taxes, and eliminating federal fossil fuel subsidies.” [Source: Fox News]

If you ever wanted to know how a crazy, out-of-touch communist would run the economy, take a look at Sanders’ plan.
Now, I’m no economist, but if the government created countless new taxes on the stock market, corporations, and the rich—I’m thinking it would create catastrophe. Sanders’ plan would put heavy burdens on just about every transaction in the stock market. The wealthiest Americans (who create businesses and jobs) would be hammered with unrealistic and abusive taxes.

Sanders wants to attack the fossil fuel industry with endless lawsuits to drain them of money. Apparently, the companies that provide us with affordable fuel and energy are now villains out of a comic book.

On top of that, he’d rip over $1 trillion from our military, “scaling back” our operations. Oh, that’s a good idea! We face dangers from Iran, Afghanistan, North Korea, Russia, China and parts beyond. But we should be rolling back our military so our country’s weak and defenseless. I know Sanders is a braindead hippy, but I didn’t know he was this stupid.

Then there’s the fact that Sanders wants to provide free health care to illegal immigrants. His plans did not address how much that would cost. So, you can expect whatever final expenses to double or even triple.

After Sanders rolled out this insane plan, he once again praised the murderous dictatorship of Fidel Castro, over how he helped Cubans learn to read. Really, Bernie? You’re still praising Castro because literacy rates rose? Nearly every developed country has schools that teach children how to read (including the United States). You can’t ignore the atrocities Castro committed, because of one small goal.

It’s hard to believe anyone would endorse Sanders after his terrible plan is unveiled. Any America who still thinks Sanders has America’s best intentions at heart is blind. He is a communist that wants to bankrupt our country and turn us into broke, enslaved Cuba.

Thank God, Donald Trump is going to kick his ass.

Ad Blocker Detected!

Advertisements fund this website. Please disable your adblocking software or whitelist our website.
Thank You!