Author

Missy Crane

Browsing

Coming out as a conservative is bad enough and will likely land yourself on a Tinsel Town “naughty list,” but declaring yourself a Trump supporter -that is career suicide.

In today’s tyrannical “Trump Derangement Syndrome” world, it takes a lot of guts for an actor to come out in support of President Trump.

Coming out as a conservative is bad enough and will likely land yourself on a Tinsel Town “naughty list,” but declaring yourself a Trump supporter -that is career suicide.

Alley is siding with Trump over the “whistleblower” impeachment charade, and is saying that President Trump is wholly justified in seeking the identity of the infamous whistleblower.

In a recent tweet, President Trump correctly stated that he deserves to meet his accuser. It’s not fair this so-called “whistleblower” is lurking in the shadows, throwing out accusations under the safe cover of anonymity. That’s not how this is supposed to work. Furthermore, some intel goon, reporting (incorrect) second-hand knowledge is not a “whistleblower.”

Alley agrees with Trump, and took to Twitter to make her argument that everyone “has the right” to face his or her accuser, especially when the accuser’s allegations are themselves based on hearsay.

“I wanna know who the “whistle blower is” … I think ANYONE has the right to face their accuser.. ANYONE…this anonymous shit is shite.. anonymous whistle blower “recounting” what was said…fuck we might as well play gossip with ghosts”

“Ok but wait.. what if an anonymous person accused you of rape because some other anonymous person said he heard you raped someone… How would you fight that in courts?”

The person reporting this “gossip” is not some “Joe Blow” on the street. From what we’ve been told, he or she is an intel official. I am sure this person is very aware of security – and clearly is well versed in spying on others.

“Not for something of this magnitude..”

Alley’s point is correct. Everyone is entitled to face his or her accuser comes from the “Confrontation Clause” of the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution.

“In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.”

Regardless of what liberals think, President Trump is still an American Citizen. He didn’t give up his citizenship when he walked into the White House.

The counter point liberals are making, is that President Trump is not being accused of something “criminal,” so somehow he has no right to face his accuser.

What do you think? How do you interput the Sixth Amendment? Do you believe President Trump

Author: Missy Crane

Source: Wayne Dupree: Brave Actress Kirstie Alley Puts Everything on The Line and Fights For Trump Over Impeachment Charade

If the Democrats opt to impeach President Trump, the impending Senate trial could be an absolute nuclear bomb for the entire Democrat Party, and the Deep State.

The Democrats are heading down a disastrous impeachment path, and I am not even sure if they fully grasp what a complete nightmare this could be for them.

If the Democrats opt to impeach President Trump, the impending Senate trial could be an absolute nuclear bomb for the entire Democrat Party, and the Deep State.

Here’s why….

If President Trump has a trial in the U.S. Senate, his lawyers would have free-reign to subpoena the likes of Obama, Hillary, Comey, Strzok, Brennan, and the entire Deep State gang.

Trump could force every one of those traitorous goons to go under oath while his legal-eagle team grills them.

It almost makes you wish the Dems go through with it, right?

The president’s defense in the Senate, accordingly, must engage, spotlight, scrutinize and expose the entire course of odious conduct by the president’s corrupt attackers, from their first spinning of the Russia collusion hoax,through the latest chapter in their attempted coup.

Everything will be relevant in the Senate trial, and everyone, no exceptions, should be subpoenaed and interrogated under oath. That means Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, John Brennan, James Comey, Peter Strzok, and the entire gang behind the coup.

That includes Strzok, his girlfriend Lisa Page, Clapper, Brennan, Comey, and whatever Deep State apparatchiks lied to the FISA judge to enable a spying operation on the Trump campaign and transition team — a crime without precedent and one that massively outweighs anything that could credibly be alleged against President Trump. [American Thinker]

This could be Trump’s only shot to actually take all of these big Deep State players down.

His legal team could aggressively defend their client, and call the entire “soft coup” gang before the Senate, and finally get all of them on record, speaking about what they did and didn’t do, to try and destroy President Trump.

He could even subpoena the DNC server as evidence in his trial.

Here is the most important benefit of this broad and aggressive approach to the president’s defense: in confronting all those who have ceaselessly sought to reverse the 2016 election, President Trump’s legal team this time will have a critical tool thus far denied them: the power to subpoena any and all persons, including all those who were elbow-deep in the Russia collusion hoax. Unlike during the feeble and tedious investigation conducted by the Washington elite’s chosen operative, Robert Mueller, every single such person will be sworn and aggressively, publicly interrogated under penalty of perjury, by formidable trial counsel.

What the anti-democratic authors of this latest putsch attempt failed to realize — in their fury of blind hatred — is that the Republican Senate majority will be in command of the scope and duration of the trial and that the truth-revealing power of the subpoena, followed by public testimony under oath, is the surest route to exposing lies and crimes. [American Thinker]

Can you imagine Rudy Giuliani or Jay Sekulow grilling Hillary Clinton on bleaching her computer while under a congressional subpoena, or Barak Obama on what he knew about the FISA warrants and spying on President Trump?

That would be glorious.

Not only that, but Trump could also subpoena Hunter Biden and Joe Biden and ask them under oath about the Ukraine scandal.

Folks, I don’t know if the Dems are willing to do down that road.

Of course, Mitch McConnell could just decide to give any House impeachment efforts the “Merrick Garland” treatment in the senate. That’s unlikely, but nothing legally binds him to hold the trial.

That’s because of a Constitution that designates the Senate with the “sole power to try” an impeachment that comes from the House. But nowhere in America’s founding document is the trial said to be a mandatory act.
Story Continued Below

Sure, it would be an unprecedented move in U.S. history for Republican leader Mitch McConnell to table Trump impeachment proceedings without allowing any significant debate or a vote to convict a president from his own party, thereby removing him from office. But it’d be well within his power.

Conventional wisdom still says there has to be a Trump trial. McConnell, after all, said in March that the Senate would have “no choice” but to hold one if the House voted for impeachment.

But political conditions can change quickly in the Trump era. And lawmakers from both parties say they wouldn’t be surprised if the Kentucky Republican ultimately made the same calculation he did in 2016 when President Barack Obama nominated Merrick Garland for the Supreme Court — only for the Democratic president to see his pick axed by McConnell under the auspices of letting voters decide who should fill the vacancy in the next election. [Politico]

What do you think will happen?

Tell us in the comments how you think this “impeachment” play would or could play out.

Author: Missy Crane

Source: Wayne Dupree: Senate Impeachment Trial Means Trump Can Put Hillary, Obama and Deep State on Trial

Ad Blocker Detected!

Advertisements fund this website. Please disable your adblocking software or whitelist our website.
Thank You!