Author

Sons of 1776

Browsing

The sole remaining Planned Parenthood abortion clinic in Missouri is expected to shut down later on this week which would bring an end to all legal abortion in the state. Planned Parenthood has failed to renew its license issued by the state’s health department for its last Missouri clinic located in St. Louis. If the license is not granted by May 31st, it will mark the first time any state has not had a functioning abortion clinic since the decision of Roe V. Wade in 1973.

“This is not a drill. This is not a warning. This is a real public health crisis,” Dr. Leana Wen, president and CEO of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, said in a statement. She also took the opportunity to attack the Trump administration, whining that “This is the world that the Trump administration and anti-women’s health politicians across the country have been pushing for – a world where abortion care is illegal and inaccessible in this country.” Her comments just prove her ignorance. People are tired of seeing innocent lives being taken in the name of convenience and yes it should be considered murder and therefore illegal. Leana sounds like someone scared that they will lose their job, which is a very real possibility considering her employer is an organization responsible for the mass murder of defenseless humans.

Dr. Wen, the same woman who once claimed she was Trumps “nightmare”, is now taking loss after loss as the Trump administration fights off the evil that is Planned Parenthood. Wen tweeted, “If Planned Parenthood’s St. Louis health center cannot provide abortion care, this will be the first time since 1974 that safe, legal abortion care will be inaccessible to people in an entire state.”

The largest abortion provider in the nation said they were being investigated by state officials over “a large number of possible deficiencies,” at their St. Louis branch. Operation Rescue obtained a list of EMS calls placed by the Reproductive Health Services Planned Parenthood of St. Louis and found nine incidents of serious emergencies, most common being hemorrhaging.

“The Planned Parenthood abortion clinic in St. Louis is one of the most dangerous abortion facilities for women in the U.S. They have sent at least 70 women to the hospital suffering serious abortion complications in the past nine years or so,” Troy Newman, president of Operation Rescue, told LifeSiteNews.com in January. “There is a history of deception, concealment of information from the state legislature, and failed inspection reports. It is a disreputable abortion clinic that should be shut down in the interest of public safety.”

While the clinics closure appears to be a result of failure to comply with regulations, Missouri Gov. Mike Parson signed a bill Friday banning abortion beyond eight weeks of pregnancy without exceptions for rape or incest, making it one of the country’s most restrictive abortion laws, behind Alabama’s recent law passed.

Kristan Hawkins, president of Students for Life of America, in a Facebook video called it a “huge victory” toward making America abortion-free. “This is huge because if we can make just one state abortion-free and show women that abortion is never needed, is never necessary, for their life and certainly not for their family’s life, other states will follow suit,” Hawkins said. “We know lives will be saved.”

Planned Parenthood said they have filed a lawsuit to try and keep the abortion clinic open. Things, however, are looking dim for Planned Parenthood as America leans more and more toward becoming a majority of Pro-lifers one victory at a time.

Pelosi and the Democrat-controlled House have been promising to impeach Trump for a long time. Since winning back the majority in 2018, they have simply been waiting for the right moment. They are ready to attack this president, hoping to eventually remove him from office. But Senate Republicans have some bad news for them.

It’s been said–by many Democrats–that the only way they can win 2020 is by impeaching Donald Trump. He has scored so many victories for America–in the economy, national security, and more–that there is nobody on the left that can beat him.

Bernie Sanders? Joe Biden? Give me a break. Trump’s economy is humiliating Democrats.

So, their only hope is to get rid of him before the 2020 Election. They were really hoping the Mueller report would have something to damage Trump. Something they could use to impeach him. But even Mueller–who spent two years on the case–cleared Trump’s name of both collusion and obstruction.

Democrats have nothing to use to take out Trump. But, instead of working with the president to help Americans, they still want impeachment. They don’t care about the crisis at the border, our crumbling infrastructure, or the many Americans impacted by recent natural disasters. They just want impeachment.

But the Republican-controlled Senate just put a stop to their impeachment train. For good.

Senate Republicans are vowing to crush the impeachment effort if the Democrat-controlled House passes articles of impeachment of President Trump.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is expected to ensure that the measure, which has caused some friction even among Democrats, would be over before it could gain traction.

Democrats in the Senate will remain largely powerless as although McConnell will have to act on the impeachment articles, it also requires 67 votes – a two-thirds majority – to convict the president…

“It would be defeated. That’s why all they want to do is talk about it,” [Sen. John Cornyn] added, suggesting Democrats are more interested in talking about impeaching Trump than actually trying to do that. “They know what the outcome would be.” [Source: Fox News]

That’s right, folks. It takes BOTH houses of Congress to impeach the president. And anti-Trump Democrats just don’t have the votes.

This is what intelligent people (like us) have been saying all along. Democrats need the Senate to go along with their pathetic scheme. It doesn’t matter if the House is finally able to pass articles of impeachment. It will go nowhere in the Senate–because Republicans enjoy a majority.

It takes a whopping 67 votes in the Senate to take down Trump. Republicans have 53 seats. That means Democrats would need 23 Republicans to vote against their own leader. That aint going to happen, folks.

It’s really amazing to think that, for months, Democrats have been vowing impeachment. They have been promising their obviously braindead base that–if they got back the House–they would take out Trump. Maybe even convict him and send him to jail.

But we always knew Trump never did anything wrong. There is no reason they can impeach him. Even still, they push for impeachment, claiming imaginary crimes this president has committed.

Even then, it’s all a pipe dream. Democrats can’t get enough supporters in the Senate to go along with their insane plan. Mitch McConnell and the rest of the GOP will strike it down so fast, it will make their heads spin.

Perhaps, if the Democrats were smart, they’d actually work with President Trump to get things done. Tornadoes just swept through the Midwest. That needs some attention. We need an infrastructure package to repair America’s aging roads and bridges. Then there’s that pesky Southern border that needs securing.

All of this could happen, if Democrats were grown-up enough to do the right thing. But they’re not. They are petty children who still can’t get over the 2016 Election.

Makes you wonder why they even still have jobs.

Recent months have seen amazing progress in the fight against abortion. Ohio passed a strict abortion law. Then Georgia passed the heartbeat bill. Alabama topped them all with the strongest abortion ban in the country. Now, another state has passed a strict pro-life law. Democrats are panicking.

Thanks to the influence of Donald Trump, conservative leaders across the country are getting bolder. And that’s an understatement! Over the course of a short period this year, numerous states have passed strong pro-life laws. These laws strike a blow against the abortion lobby, which makes millions off the death of unborn children.

President Trump has signaled an end to Roe v. Wade for a long time. He promised during the election to appoint pro-life judges to the Supreme Court. In his first term alone, he’s appointed two justices to the highest court in the land. We all know the left fought like mad to prevent his second appointment.

That’s because with the appointment of Justice Brett Kavanaugh to the SCOTUS, we now have a solid, conservative majority on the bench.

Which means, any day now, a case might be brought before the Supreme Court that could challenge Roe v. Wade.

Right now, we have at least three laws that could be brought before the Supreme Court that could overturn the decades-old ruling. Georgia passed its vital heartbeat bill, which bans abortion if the child’s heartbeat can be detected.

Hollywood was so outraged by this compassionate and science-based law, that many film makers refuse to shoot films in the state. Saving babies at the cost of Hollywood cash? That’s a good exchange to me.

Alabama passed its abortion ban with the intention of taking it to court. They knew pro-choice lobbyists would immediate sue; Alabama’s plan was to take it to the SCOTUS all along.

Now another state has joined the movement to outlaw the evil and barbaric practice of abortion in America.

On Friday, Missouri Gov. Mike Parson, a Republican, signed into law one of the most pro-life laws in the nation, outlawing abortion at eight weeks, save an exception for the life or risk of major physical harm to the mother. The legislation does not include an exception for rape or incest, and sex- , ability- , and race-selective abortions are also banned outright…

Additionally, if Roe v. Wade were to be overturned, the law is designed to kick-in as a full abortion ban.

Responding to criticism over the lack of exceptions for abortion post-eight weeks, Gov. Parson argued that two months is enough time to decide to get an abortion, even in tough cases.

“Is it a terrible thing that happens in those situations? Yes it is,” the Republican acknowledged, according to Fox. “But the reality of it is bad things do happen sometimes. But you have two months to decide what you’re going to do with that issue, and I believe in two months you can make a decision.” [Source: Daily Wire]

Missouri’s law has been cleverly crafted. It does not punish a mother who gets an abortion, but someone who performs an abortion can face 15 weeks in jail.

If the law faces challenges in court, it can be rolled back to a 14, 18, or 20 week ban. If Roe v. Wade is overturned, the law becomes a full abortion ban.

This is some pretty thorough legislating, if you ask me. Missouri lawmakers thought of every possibility, in order to make this law work. They were counting on the abortion lobbyists to challenge it. Even if they do and win, the law still will be in effect, protecting unborn lives as best it can.

Already those who profit off of murder spoke out against the law. A Planned Parenthood spokesperson said abortions are a human rights issue. Sure, but what about the rights of the human growing inside him mother’s womb?

Abortionists love to claim they are protecting Americans’ rights. But they conveniently ignore the rights of Americans who are most vulnerable, most in need of protecting and defending.

In reality, all that Planned Parenthood cares about is collecting hundreds of millions of dollars from the government.

At least we have many states joining the fight to end this horrible practice. PP’s days are numbered.

Michael Avenatti was the former lawyer of pornstar Stormy Daniels. Last year, he was going from media outlet to media outlet, claiming he would be the one to take down President Donald Trump. Some liberals even declared Avenatti should run for president. Oh, how things change. Now the disgraced lawyer is in big trouble.

Once upon a time, Michael Avenatti was a media darling. Every major liberal news outlet invited him on their shows. The man, who was representing pornstar Stormy Daniels, claimed he would be the one to expose Trump of wrongdoing. He launched a lawsuit against the president. He tweeted that he knew Trump and his son would be indicted. He even got involved in the Brett Kavanaugh attacks.

It all started after Stormy Daniels failed to hurt Donald Trump. The woman was given ample media attention to tell her story. She claimed that years ago she had an intimate relationship with Donald Trump—one that Trump continues to deny. She also claimed that, as he started his candidacy for president, a man confronted her and threatened her child. With no proof, of course.

Quickly the media realized Daniels had nothing—and the American people didn’t care. So, they dropped her like a hot potato. Soon after, her lawyer grabbed the spotlight, announcing he was suing the President of the United States.

A judge threw out the lawsuit and demanded Stormy Daniels pay Trump’s legal fees. Ouch. Daniels then turned on her lawyer, claiming she never told him to launch the lawsuit.

After that, Avenatti popped up again, this time representing a woman claiming to be assaulted by Supreme Court Justice nominee Brett Kavanaugh. This would be the third woman to make accusations against the man and, like all the others, she had no proof. Her wild claims though—that Kavanaugh led a “rape gang” in college—were so absurd, they derailed the Senate’s attempts at framing the man. Many Democrats blamed Avenatti for their failure at stopping Kavanaugh’s confirmation.

Soon after that, we learned that authorities were looking into Avenatti’s behavior. One of his clients was suing. Now, an avalanche has fallen on Avenatti’s head. And he’s not going to dig his way out of it.

Embattled attorney Michael Avenatti was charged by federal prosecutors in New York Wednesday with defrauding adult-film star Stormy Daniels, the client who propelled Avenatti into the national spotlight.

Avenatti, 48, faces one count of wire fraud and one count of aggravated identity theft. He faces up to 22 years in prison if convicted of those charges. Daniels is not named in the indictment, but a federal law enforcement official confirmed to Fox News that she is the client prosecutors claimed Avenatti defrauded…

According to prosecutors, Avenatti stole two payments totaling $297,500 from an advance Daniels was supposed to receive from a book deal in the summer of 2018. According to the indictment, Avenatti sent a doctored letter with Daniels’ signature to her literary agent that instructed the agent to divert the money to an account controlled by Avenatti. The lawyer then spent the money “on airfare, hotels, car services, restaurants and meal delivery, online retailers, payroll for his law firm and another business he owned, and insurance.” [Source: Fox News]

Imagine that! A sleazy lawyer who wrongfully attacked the president turns out to be a crook!

Avenatti tried to exploit his client for his own fame and fortune. On top of that, he robbed Daniels of cash to pay for his own luxurious lifestyle. This is a man who went on TV to accuse the president of all kinds of wrongdoing. Yet, all along, Avenatti was the one lying, stealing, and breaking the law.

This is only the tip of the iceberg of Avenatti’s schemes. He’s defrauded other clients and tried to extort money from major companies. Looks like the man who thought he could take down Trump will soon be enjoying a nice, small jail cell.

There’s a lesson for all dishonest, left-wing crooks. If you try to take down Trump, through your lies and tricks, it’s going to backfire, bigly.

This week, Texas passed a bill referred to as “Save Chick-fil-A.” The bill will go a long way in protecting those who cherish their religious liberties. As you can imagine, the left is outraged. They are trying to oppose the bill, and anyone that supports it. Their shocking lack of respect for our First Amendment rights tells you everything you need to know about them.

It’s pretty sad how little Democrats care about Americans’ religious rights. Freedom of religion is one of the most important rights protected under our Constitution. It is the first right listed in the Bill of Rights. In fact, it is the very reason the first settlers of America left Europe to come here.

But today, liberals across the country trample our right to worship God, in favor of protecting the so-called rights of one small group.

Democrats have frequently attacked Christians and Christian-owned businesses for their views on homosexuality. They have tried to destroy a bakery, just because the owner believes in the Bible. Some liberals have even tried to destroy the careers of beloved Fixer Upper stars, the Gaines, because of their strong Christian faith and their church’s stance of gay marriage.

And of course, there is Chick-fil-A. We all know that this restaurant was founded by a devout Christian. It has locations all across America. It is one of the most popular restaurants in the country and has exploded in size over recent years.

Yet, because the owner has expressed his support for the Biblical definition of marriage, Democrats want it gone. Democrats and the gay community have been calling for a boycott of this restaurant for nearly a decade. They want every person who works at Chick-fil-A, young or old, black or white, gay or straight, to be out of a job.

All because the owner is a Christian.

Texas lawmakers have had enough. They recently passed a bill, soon to be signed by the governor, that strikes a blow for all religious citizens. The bill forbids the government from taking action against a person based on their religious background. It upholds our First Amendment rights and will prevent Democrats from persecuting Christians over gay rights issues.

Of course, Democrats are panicking.

On Tuesday, the Texas House passed SB 1978, the so-called “Save Chick-fil-A” bill, engendering blowback from Democrats and LGBTQ activists. The bill passed 79-64 after passing the Texas Senate 19-12 last week. It now heads for the desk of Texas Governor Greg Abbott, who has left little doubt he will sign the bill into law…

Rep. Matt Krause, the author of the House bill, who stated there’s “no discriminatory intent in (the bill) at all,” adding, “We want to make sure that if you give to the Salvation Army, you’re not labeled bigoted or discriminatory.”

The bill states, “Notwithstanding any other law, a governmental entity may not take any adverse action against any person based wholly or partly on the person’s membership in, affiliation with, or contribution, donation, or other support provided to a religious organization.” [Source: Daily Wire]

Democrats in Texas and around the country want gay people to have more rights than the rest of us. They attack, sue, and bully anyone that dares to have an opinion that contradicts their own. If you believe in the Bible and call yourself a Christian, they instantly label you a bigot or homophobe.

They try to use gay rights as a way to discriminate against the millions of Christians in America. Their goal is clear: to erode our First Amendment rights so that, one day, we can’t even openly profess our faith.

Meanwhile, gay and transgender people are encouraged to throw their lifestyles in our faces. If anyone even hints at disagreement, they are branded monsters.

Texas is standing up for the millions of Americans that have been bullied, ignored, and slandered by the left. This new bill will prevent—at least in Texas—Democrats’ ongoing campaign to erase America’s Biblical foundations.

Now all that’s left is for the rest of the states to follow suit.

Campaigns win or lose on the funds they are able to raise. Right now, over twenty Democrats are fighting for the White House. Numerous other seats in the House and Senate are up for grabs. Both parties are determined to win. But the numbers aren’t lying and it looks like one party has the upper hand when it comes to contributions.

Donations to political parties don’t determine who will ultimately win an election. We all remember that Hillary Clinton had an estimated $2 billion in 2016—but still lost to Donald Trump. But how much a party or campaign can raise—and from whom they raise it—tells a lot about the enthusiasm and determination of their base.

If a candidate is able to raise lots of cash, it suggests that there are millions of passionate supporters around the country. And, if they are willing to open their wallets, they’ll definitely show up at the polls on Election Day.

The reports are in and one party definitely has the fundraising edge over the other.

The Republican National Committee (RNC) raised a whopping $15.9 million in April, more than double the money the Democratic National Committee managed to raise the same month.

The Democratic Party’s key body raised just $6.6 million, according to new campaign finance data, even as the party is bracing for competitive 2020 elections, with the White House, House and Senate.

The disclosures reveal that the RNC has so far amassed a massive war chest totaling $34.7 million at the end of the month, while the DNC so far has $7.6 million on hand.

Not only Republicans are beating Democrats in total fundraising, the majority of donations to the RNC came from small donors who donated up to $200. According to the disclosures, nearly $9 million in donations came from such donors, while just over $4 million were from large donors. The rest of the fund came via other forms of contributions. [Source: Fox News]

Wow. Maybe the Democrats should just throw in the towel right now, save themselves some embarrassment.

Republicans raised more cash in April, much more, than the Democrats. Not only that, but they are way ahead of Democrats with their overall fundraising efforts.

What does that tell you? The same Americans that passionately elected Donald Trump are already eager to reelect him. So much so, that over a year before the election, they are shelling out cash so that he and his allies in the RNC will have the resources to beat the Democrats.

Even more important than the amount raised is where it’s from. Most of the money donated to the RNC came from small donors—no more than $200. To raise $9 million from just small donations means that millions of Americans are giving. Regular, everyday citizens like you and me are opening their wallets to make sure Trump continues his work.

That should make Democrats very worried.

Democrats have claimed to be the party of the working and middle classes for years. They used to represent everyday Americans. Liberals pretended to fight for your rights against the “cruel” upper classes.

Those days are long gone. Democrats have come to represent the wealthy elites of our society, the corrupt swamp that doesn’t care about you or your family. They bow to globalists and the super-rich, willing to sell out our communities to make their donors happy.

Americans know this, which is why millions of regular folks are giving to Donald Trump and the Republicans, not the Democrats.

We’ve seen how Trump has made good on just about every promise he made in 2016. America is doing so well, because of the hard work he’s done. He’s accomplished so much, in the face of unprecedented opposition, obstruction, and persecution.

He’s been able to transform our economy, while the left opposes him at every turn. Imagine what he could do, if he had a Congress that supported him!

The 2020 Election is still over a year away. We’re going to hear about all kinds of developments in the coming months. Eventually, the Democrats will have to pick the man who will try to oust Trump. But we already know the race is over.

Democratic hopeful for 2020, Pete Buttigieg spoke at a town hall even Sunday. While trying to win over the viewers, he made major promises about what he’d do to taxes if elected. He admited what he really means by “fair taxes.” This is something you need to know.

No Democrat can beat Trump on the economy. Thanks to President Trump’s policies, the U.S. economy is roaring like never before. It hasn’t been this good in perhaps a generation. The stock market is growing. Jobs are pouring into the country. Salaries are high. For the first time ever, there are more available jobs than workers!

What can any 2020 Democrat promise to beat that? Nothing, really. Instead, they want to focus on their own plan to help the American economy—which amounts to creating bigger, costlier government programs.

Pete Buttigieg is one of the Democrats vying for the top spot. Like all the others, he’s a closet socialist that wants to burden America is wasteful and toxic government handouts. These handouts won’t strengthen the economy, but cripple it.

When speaking at a town hall this Sunday, he tried to dance around his agenda. But the truth came out.

Democratic 2020 presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg admitted during his Sunday town hall on Fox News that when he talks about “fair taxes,” what he means is “higher taxes.”

“Mayor Pete” went on to argue that debt and deficits can play a legitimate role in a functioning economy as long as the debt is tied to programs or initiatives that will eventually pay for themselves

“When candidates, Democrats, go out promising — as I think we should — that we’re going to have major increases in investment in things like education, health and infrastructure, we also gotta be willing to say where the revenue’s going to come from,” Buttigieg explained. “That’s why we really do need to entertain ideas like, I would say a fairer — which means higher — marginal income tax rate on those with the most.” [Source: The Daily Caller]

Uh-huh. Nice try, Pete. What he’s forced to admit here is that he can’t compete with Trump’s tax victory.

President Trump ticked off radical Democrats by cutting taxes for most Americans. That includes wealthier Americans—you know, the people who start businesses and create jobs? Trump’s tax cuts bill has saved millions of jobs and increased wages.

Pete wants to erase all that by raising taxes on “those with the most.” Why should we punish people who work hard to be successful? Why does Pete think that government programs that waste taxpayer dollars “will eventually pay for themselves”?

Mayor Pete wants to raise taxes on the wealthy. But the wealthy only pay a fraction of what the rest of us pay. In order to pay for all his increases in spending, Pete will raise taxes on every hard-working American.

His solution to Trump’s economic success is to raise taxes to pay for bloated government spending. He knows that will kill our prosperity and grind our economy to a halt. He doesn’t care. Like the rest of the Democrats, he wants our economy to fail. Just like Obama, he wants us poor, suffering, and out of work. Just so that more Americans will become dependent on a bloated, runaway government.

And let’s not forget all those globalist that bankroll the Democrats. These politicians, like Mayor Pete, do the bidding of rich foreign businessmen, who want America to fail. They want jobs outsourced overseas, more migrants flooding our nation, and the value of our dollar to drop. That way, they can plunder our prosperity to make themselves even richer.

Pete Buttigieg doesn’t care that America is thriving today. He wants to drag us back into the Dark Ages where America was last among the rest of the world. He wants Americans to be poor, broke, and without hope. He wants the government taxing and spending like there’s no tomorrow.

Because, if he was president, there wouldn’t be.

As more details come out over the Russian collusion hoax one thing is clear: Trump’s campaign was spied on. His opposition abused their power to try to stop Trump from winning the 2016 Election. President Trump called out those who spied on him, making this one vow.

For over two years, the Democrats have pushed the lie that Donald Trump worked with Russia to steal the 2016 Election. Anyone with half a brain knew it was a lie from the start. There has never been real evidence to even suggest Trump was working with a foreign power.

That didn’t stop former FBI director and top swamp dweller James Comey from starting an investigation. When he was fired, that case ended up in the hands of Robert Mueller. The media frequently pointed to Mueller’s agonizingly long case as “proof” Trump was a traitor and soon to be impeached.

Recently, Mueller’s final report came out, proving Trump did not colluded with Russia. Democrats, though are still pushing for something—anything—that might take Trump down. But the real crimes are coming to light and they have nothing to do with Trump’s team.

Attorney General Barr has appointed a man to investigate just what Obama’s FBI did during 2016. Turns out, they weren’t being very honest when they “investigated” Trump’s campaign. In fact, they were breaking the law when they sought warrants to spy on Trump’s staffers.

Now, Trump is calling out what his rivals tried to do to him—and he’s making a promise.

President Trump issued a grave warning Friday to those who allegedly “spied” on his 2016 campaign, calling their actions “treason” and saying “long jail sentences” are in order.

“My Campaign for President was conclusively spied on. Nothing like this has ever happened in American Politics. A really bad situation. TREASON means long jail sentences, and this was TREASON!” Trump tweeted.

Trump’s claim that the campaign was “conclusively” spied on follows Attorney General Bill Barr’s testimony that “spying did occur” against the Trump campaign in 2016…

Earlier this week, it was revealed that Barr had appointed John Durham, the U.S. attorney from Connecticut, to lead that investigation — to cover “all intelligence collection activities” related to the Trump campaign during the 2016 presidential election and any misconduct during the early stages of the FBI’s original Russia probe. [Source: Fox News]

Treason’s a strong word. But what else can you call what Obama and Clinton’s people did in 2016?

Clinton paid foreign agents to craft a fake dossier full of lies to slander Trump. That dossier found its way to Obama’s FBI, who used it as “evidence” to acquire a FISA warrant. That warrant was used to spy on at least one Trump campaign staffer. Obama violated American citizens’ Fourth Amendment rights—illegally—in the hopes of finding dirt on Trump.

And that’s just the stuff we know about!

Recently, we’ve learned that Obama’s FBI used that warrant to comb through Trump’s emails. They were seriously looking for anything they could leak to the press—in order kill Trump’s chances at winning.

Yet despite all their schemes, Donald Trump did win—thanks to the determination of the American people.

This wasn’t about stopping Russia from meddling in the election. We already know that Obama’s FBI was aware of Russian attempts to hack DNC emails—but did nothing about it. They were more concerned with spying on Trump’s campaign—over political motives—than stopping a real crime.

President Trump is truly convinced his campaign was spied on. Members of his staff—perhaps even he—were spied on by the government. He’s right in saying this has never happened in the history of American politics. Trump has promised long jail sentences for those who committed this treason.

The only thing we need to ask now is: who was ultimately responsible for these crimes and will they face the consequences of their actions?

I guess we’ll have to wait and see.

In the latest effort of a delusional athlete thinking that they have more political influence than they do, U.S. soccer star Megan Rapinoe stated in an interview Monday she will “probably never sing the national anthem again” weeks before the team is set to defend their World Cup title in France.

After former NFL backup Colin Kaepernick decided to protest racial injustice and inequality while getting paid millions to keep the bench warm, Rapinoe, was the first white athlete to kneel during the national anthem during a sporting event. She revealed in a recent interview with Yahoo Sports the backlash she received over her choice to take a knee.

Rapinoe apparently wasn’t satisfied with the controversy that stemmed from her decision to kneel during the anthem originally. A decision that is even more offensive due to the fact that rather than just representing a team on a national level, Rapinoe is instead representing the United States itself on an international level. She expressed her displeasure with U.S. soccer’s statement about the kneeling controversy and the federation’s decision to adopt a rule requiring players to “stand and honor the flag.”

“Using this blanketed patriotism as a defense against what the protest actually is was pretty cowardly. I think the NFL does it,” she said to Yahoo Sports. “I felt like the statement from U.S. Soccer, and then the rule they made without ever talking to me, that was the same as what the NFL was doing – just to not have the conversation, to try to just stop me from doing what I’m doing instead of at least having a conversation, and trying to figure out a [solution] that makes sense for everyone.”

While she will still represent the U.S. in their effort to win another World Cup, Rapinoe called herself a “walking protest” she believes the Trump administration doesn’t “value all American equally.”

Rapinoe then went on to attempt to criticize the Trump administration based on…Trump’s appearance?

“I feel like it’s kind of defiance in and of itself to just be who I am and wear the jersey, and represent it,” Rapinoe told the website. “Because I’m as talented as I am, I get to be here, you don’t get to tell me if I can be here or not. So it’s kind of a good ‘F you’ to any sort of inequality or bad sentiments that the administration might have towards people who don’t look exactly like him. Which, God help us if we all looked like him. Scary. Really scary. Ahh, disturbing.” She speaks of an administration she believes has bad sentiments towards people who look different, while speaking ill of Trump for looking different from her. Typical liberal hypocrisy.

Rapinoe knelt during the national anthem before her match against the Chicago Red Stars in 2016. She called her act a “little nod” to Kaepernick and “everything that he’s standing for right now.” She lamented to Yahoo Sports that the situation “wasn’t super easy for me.”

“I think that was a really good lesson for me: This is what it’s going to take for things to change, norms to change, conventions to change, to try to break down white supremacy and break down racial bias,” she said. “It’s going to take it being hard. For everyone. … That really resonated with me.”

Apparently taking a knee during the national anthem sang before U.S. soccer game is “hard” and “breaks down white supremacy”. Liberals are so out of touch with reality that they don’t even know who white supremacists are and what would actually make a difference in society.

Their constant assumption that people in general are discriminated against for race or gender, is the exact type of bigotry that they themselves arbitrarily accuse President Trump of.

A U.S. attorney has been appointed by Attorney General William Barr to examine the origins of the Russia investigation to determine if the intelligence collection efforts targeting the Trump campaign were “lawful and appropriate.”

Barr intends to flip the script on Democrats with the selection of John Durham, the Connecticut attorney who will conduct the investigation. Durham is known as a “hard-charging, bulldog” prosecutor and his appointment becomes a powerful chess move as the Trump admin pushes for answers as to why federal authorities conducted surveillance on them as well as aiming to uncover the potential truth that Democrats were in fact the ones who improperly colluded with foreign governments.

Sources close to the matter have said that the primary focus of the probe revolves around the pre-transition period – prior to November 7th 2016 – including the use and initiation of informants along with Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) abuses. A U.S intelligence informant posing as a Cambridge University research assistant in September 2016 attempted to extract any possible ties between Russia and the Trump campaign from then Trump foreign policy adviser, George Papadopoulos.

Durham has an impressive resume, having previously investigated law enforcement corruption, the destruction of CIA videotapes and the Boston FBI office’s relationship with mobsters. His appointment to this investigation comes roughly a month after Barr said that he believed “spying did occur” on the Trump campaign In 2016. He then went on to say he was assembling a team to look into the origins of the special counsel’s investigation.

Following the release of the Mueller report which showed that Trump and his campaign did not collude with Russia, Barr has been made a punching bag for a clearly frustrated Democratic party. Mueller’s final report has led to yet another battle in D.C. lost by the Dems as they continue to whine about the number of redactions in the report, which the DOJ says are necessary as they pertain to grand jury matters.

The FBI used a heavily disputed Washington Post opinion piece word for word that falsely accused the Trump campaign of being compromised in order to obtain a secret FISA warrant to spy on Trump aide Carter Page. Additionally, the FBI assured the court multiple times that it “did not believe” former British spy Christoper Steele was the source for a Yahoo News article implicating the Trump aide in Russian collusion.

London court records, however, tell a different story. The records indicate that Steele briefed Yahoo News and a number of other reporters under the order of Fusion GPS, the same research firm behind the dossier. A little piece of information the FBI left out of the FISA app was that Fusion GPS was retained by Hillary Clinton and the DNC at the time.

Not to mention, earlier this year internal FBI messages showing a senior DOJ official bringing up concerns regarding bias in a key FISA warrant, but that didn’t stop the FBI. “There’s a document that’s classified that I’m gonna try to get unclassified that takes the dossier — all the pages of it — and it has verification to one side,” Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham said on Fox News’ “Sunday Morning Futures” this weekend. “There really is no verification, other than media reports that were generated by reporters that received the dossier.”

Graham specifically cited a report by The Hill’s John Soloman which states that the FBI was expressly told that Steele, their confidential informant, had admitted to a contact at the State Department that he was “keen” on leaking his discredited dossier in order to influence the 2016 election.

Ad Blocker Detected!

Advertisements fund this website. Please disable your adblocking software or whitelist our website.
Thank You!